After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these systems. Right from lie diagnosis tools tested at the boundary to a system for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being made use of in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to run these systems and to follow their legal right for safety.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from getting at the programs of safeguards. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice/ whilst they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.